linux-kernel - [PATCH v3 8/8] nvdimm: Fix firmware activation deadlock scenarios

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 21 Apr 2022 08:33:51 -0700
From:   Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:     linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, vishal.l.verma@...el.com,
        alison.schofield@...el.com, nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 8/8] nvdimm: Fix firmware activation deadlock scenarios

Lockdep reports the following deadlock scenarios for CXL root device
power-management, device_prepare(), operations, and device_shutdown()
operations for 'nd_region' devices:

---
 Chain exists of:
   &nvdimm_region_key --> &nvdimm_bus->reconfig_mutex --> system_transition_mutex

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(system_transition_mutex);
                                lock(&nvdimm_bus->reconfig_mutex);
                                lock(system_transition_mutex);
   lock(&nvdimm_region_key);

--

 Chain exists of:
   &cxl_nvdimm_bridge_key --> acpi_scan_lock --> &cxl_root_key

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&cxl_root_key);
                                lock(acpi_scan_lock);
                                lock(&cxl_root_key);
   lock(&cxl_nvdimm_bridge_key);

---

These stem from holding nvdimm_bus_lock() over hibernate_quiet_exec()
which walks the entire system device topology taking device_lock() along
the way. The nvdimm_bus_lock() is protecting against unregistration,
multiple simultaneous ops callers, and preventing activate_show() from
racing activate_store(). For the first 2, the lock is redundant.
Unregistration already flushes all ops users, and sysfs already prevents
multiple threads to be active in an ops handler at the same time. For
the last userspace should already be waiting for its last
activate_store() to complete, and does not need activate_show() to flush
the write side, so this lock usage can be deleted in these attributes.

Fixes: 48001ea50d17 ("PM, libnvdimm: Add runtime firmware activation support")
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
---
 drivers/nvdimm/core.c |    4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/nvdimm/core.c b/drivers/nvdimm/core.c
index 144926b7451c..7c7f4a43fd4f 100644
--- a/drivers/nvdimm/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvdimm/core.c
@@ -395,10 +395,8 @@ static ssize_t activate_show(struct device *dev,
 	if (!nd_desc->fw_ops)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	nvdimm_bus_lock(dev);
 	cap = nd_desc->fw_ops->capability(nd_desc);
 	state = nd_desc->fw_ops->activate_state(nd_desc);
-	nvdimm_bus_unlock(dev);
 
 	if (cap < NVDIMM_FWA_CAP_QUIESCE)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -443,7 +441,6 @@ static ssize_t activate_store(struct device *dev,
 	else
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	nvdimm_bus_lock(dev);
 	state = nd_desc->fw_ops->activate_state(nd_desc);
 
 	switch (state) {
@@ -461,7 +458,6 @@ static ssize_t activate_store(struct device *dev,
 	default:
 		rc = -ENXIO;
 	}
-	nvdimm_bus_unlock(dev);
 
 	if (rc == 0)
 		rc = len;