linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] md/raid5: Drop the do_prepare flag in raid5_make

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YmD2ZC2dJxz8F6/T@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 23:15:00 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
        David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/12] md/raid5: Drop the do_prepare flag in
 raid5_make_request()

On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 01:54:19PM -0600, Logan Gunthorpe wrote:
> prepare_to_wait() can be reasonably called after schedule instead of
> setting a flag and preparing in the next loop iteration.
> 
> This means that prepare_to_wait() will be called before
> read_seqcount_begin(), but there shouldn't be any reason that
> the order matters here. On the first iteration of the loop
> prepare_to_wait() is already called first.

Looks good:

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>