lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmD2R0AJ54yPRZhR@infradead.org>
Date:   Wed, 20 Apr 2022 23:14:31 -0700
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Logan Gunthorpe <logang@...tatee.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-raid@...r.kernel.org,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Guoqing Jiang <guoqing.jiang@...ux.dev>,
        Stephen Bates <sbates@...thlin.com>,
        Martin Oliveira <Martin.Oliveira@...eticom.com>,
        David Sloan <David.Sloan@...eticom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/12] md/raid5: Factor out helper from
 raid5_make_request() loop

> +	if (unlikely(conf->reshape_progress != MaxSector)) {
> +		/* spinlock is needed as reshape_progress may be

Normal kernel style is to stat with a

		/*

line and to captalize the first word.  (also applies for a few other
comments).

> +		if (must_retry) {
> +			raid5_release_stripe(sh);
> +			return STRIPE_SCHEDULE_AND_RETRY;

The raid5_release_stripe cleanup is duplicated a few times.  I think
using goto based unwinding would be hepful in this function.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ