linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup: Introduce cpu controller test suite

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220422123227.gtirbsygpjek3iss@dev0025.ash9.facebook.com>
Date:   Fri, 22 Apr 2022 05:32:27 -0700
From:   David Vernet <void@...ifault.com>
To:     Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:     lizefan.x@...edance.com, hannes@...xchg.org,
        cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cgroup: Introduce cpu controller test suite

Hi Tejun,

On Thu, Apr 21, 2022 at 12:21:18PM -1000, Tejun Heo wrote:
> * Can you please repost w/ Ingo and Peterz cc'd?

Will do, I'll cc them on v2.

> * Maybe cpucg instead of cgcpu?

Agreed, that seems more intuitive. I'll change it in v2.

> * Single level testing is great but extending the case to cover deeper
>   nesting level would be great. ie. a test case with multi level tree w/
>   both under and over provisioned parts in the tree.

This sounds like a great idea. I have another patch set that I was planning
to send out which adds a few more testcases. I can include some testcases
in that set which validate more complicated nesting setups.

Thanks,
David