[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wh-F2KtXkQueVJRNqWr7O737NzN=8mYA_r-h-16=VxLQA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 18:03:00 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc: Natikar Basavaraj <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
Gong Richard <Richard.Gong@....com>,
Linux regressions mailing list <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix regression in 5.18 for GPIO
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 6:15 AM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>
> This patch is being sent directly to you because there has been
> a regression in 5.18 that I identified and sent a fix up that has been
> reviewed/tested/acked for nearly a week but the current subsystem
> maintainer (Bartosz) hasn't picked it up to send to you.
Applied.
I'm not sure the "cc: stable" makes much sense since the bug was
introduced in this release, but I assume you added it because the
problem commit was also marked for stable.
The "Fixes:" tag should take care of it, but I left that cc:stable alone.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists