linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix regression in 5.18 for GPIO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:41:14 +0200
From:   Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
To:     Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@....com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Natikar Basavaraj <Basavaraj.Natikar@....com>,
        Gong Richard <Richard.Gong@....com>,
        regressions@...ts.linux.dev,
        Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Shreeya Patel <shreeya.patel@...labora.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/1] Fix regression in 5.18 for GPIO

On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 3:15 PM Mario Limonciello
<mario.limonciello@....com> wrote:
>
> Linus,
>
> This patch is being sent directly to you because there has been
> a regression in 5.18 that I identified and sent a fix up that has been
> reviewed/tested/acked for nearly a week but the current subsystem
> maintainer (Bartosz) hasn't picked it up to send to you.
>

Hi Mario!

I don't have any previous submission in my inbox. Are you sure to have
used my current address (brgl@...ev.pl)?

Bart

> It's a severe problem; anyone who hits it:
> 1) Power button doesn't work anymore
> 2) Can't resume their laptop from S3 or s2idle
>
> Because the original patch was cc stable@, it landed in stable releases
> and has been breaking people left and right as distros track the stable
> channels.  The patch is well tested. Would you please consider to pick
> this up directly to fix that regression?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mario Limonciello (1):
>   gpio: Request interrupts after IRQ is initialized
>
>  drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>