[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220425181407.lknemxqooz7yidcz@mercury.elektranox.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:14:07 +0200
From: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...ts.collabora.co.uk,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 18/19] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC
Hi,
Thanks for having a look.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:16:13PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2022-04-22 18:09, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > ...
> > + cpu_l0: cpu@0 {
> > + device_type = "cpu";
> > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> > + reg = <0x0>;
> > + enable-method = "psci";
> > + capacity-dmips-mhz = <530>;
> > + clocks = <&scmi_clk SCMI_CLK_CPUL>;
> > + i-cache-size = <32768>;
> > + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
> > + i-cache-sets = <128>;
> > + d-cache-size = <32768>;
> > + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> > + d-cache-sets = <128>;
> > + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache_l0>;
> > + #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > + dynamic-power-coefficient = <228>;
> > + };
>
> Is there any particular reason for not including more of the CPUs?
Yes, see below.
> > + its: interrupt-controller@...40000 {
> > + compatible = "arm,gic-v3-its";
> > + msi-controller;
> > + #msi-cells = <1>;
> > + reg = <0x0 0xfe640000 0x0 0x20000>;
> > + };
> > + };
>
> Does the ITS (and other bits related to GIC memory accesses) actually work,
> or will we have more of the same issues as RK356x?
The GIC in RK3588 is has the same shareability limitation as the RK356x,
but fixed the 32bit limitation. That's why I just added the boot cpu core
for now; adding any other cpu core breaks the boot without the downstream
shareability patch and I'm still investigating.
-- Sebastian
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists