[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMdYzYr4ZNDzLGn-ArT4dW+F5c598rsWpACNMpuJRMY7a0yb=A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:37:41 -0400
From: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
To: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org,
"open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
arm-mail-list <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel@...ts.collabora.co.uk,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>, kernel@...labora.com,
Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@...k-chips.com>,
Elaine Zhang <zhangqing@...k-chips.com>,
Sugar Zhang <sugar.zhang@...k-chips.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 18/19] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add base DT for rk3588 SoC
On Mon, Apr 25, 2022 at 2:14 PM Sebastian Reichel
<sebastian.reichel@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thanks for having a look.
>
> On Fri, Apr 22, 2022 at 07:16:13PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > On 2022-04-22 18:09, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > > ...
> > > + cpu_l0: cpu@0 {
> > > + device_type = "cpu";
> > > + compatible = "arm,cortex-a55";
> > > + reg = <0x0>;
> > > + enable-method = "psci";
> > > + capacity-dmips-mhz = <530>;
> > > + clocks = <&scmi_clk SCMI_CLK_CPUL>;
> > > + i-cache-size = <32768>;
> > > + i-cache-line-size = <64>;
> > > + i-cache-sets = <128>;
> > > + d-cache-size = <32768>;
> > > + d-cache-line-size = <64>;
> > > + d-cache-sets = <128>;
> > > + next-level-cache = <&l2_cache_l0>;
> > > + #cooling-cells = <2>;
> > > + dynamic-power-coefficient = <228>;
> > > + };
> >
> > Is there any particular reason for not including more of the CPUs?
>
> Yes, see below.
>
> > > + its: interrupt-controller@...40000 {
> > > + compatible = "arm,gic-v3-its";
> > > + msi-controller;
> > > + #msi-cells = <1>;
> > > + reg = <0x0 0xfe640000 0x0 0x20000>;
> > > + };
> > > + };
> >
> > Does the ITS (and other bits related to GIC memory accesses) actually work,
> > or will we have more of the same issues as RK356x?
>
> The GIC in RK3588 is has the same shareability limitation as the RK356x,
> but fixed the 32bit limitation. That's why I just added the boot cpu core
> for now; adding any other cpu core breaks the boot without the downstream
> shareability patch and I'm still investigating.
There's no way to avoid this issue unfortunately.
See my awful hacked together patch:
https://gitlab.com/pine64-org/quartz-bsp/linux-next/-/commit/8b34fd2a74321f8f5d7731b63eee0f9e03d1393b
Considering the ITS exists pretty much just for MSIs, and my PCIe
series introduces support for legacy interrupts, you may get away with
doing the mbi-alias currently implemented in rk356x.
Note, there are *some* compatibility issues with mbi-alias MSIs,
particularly with high IRQ cards like the Intel x520.
>
> -- Sebastian
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-rockchip mailing list
> Linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
Powered by blists - more mailing lists