[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ymb6AWcLkUnqsslp@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 14:44:01 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...ts.collabora.co.uk,
Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>, kernel@...labora.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv1 19/19] arm64: dts: rockchip: Add rk3588-evb1 board
On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 12:09:21PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/04/2022 19:09, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> > From: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> >
> > Add board file for the RK3588 evaluation board. While the hardware
> > offers plenty of peripherals and connectivity this basic implementation
> > just handles things required to successfully boot Linux from eMMC
> > and connect via UART.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kever Yang <kever.yang@...k-chips.com>
> > [rebase, update commit message, use EVB1 for SoC bringup]
> > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Reichel <sebastian.reichel@...labora.com>
> > ---
> > .../devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml | 5 +++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile | 1 +
> > .../boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts | 34 +++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 40 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > index eece92f83a2d..b14d0c84c69b 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/rockchip.yaml
> > @@ -664,6 +664,11 @@ properties:
> > - const: rockchip,rk3568-bpi-r2pro
> > - const: rockchip,rk3568
> >
> > + - description: Rockchip RK3588 Evaluation board
> > + items:
> > + - const: rockchip,rk3588-evb1-v10
> > + - const: rockchip,rk3588
> > +
> > additionalProperties: true
> >
> > ...
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > index 4ae9f35434b8..8a53ab6d37a1 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/Makefile
> > @@ -61,3 +61,4 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3566-pinenote-v1.2.dtb
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3566-quartz64-a.dtb
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3568-evb1-v10.dtb
> > dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3568-bpi-r2-pro.dtb
> > +dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ROCKCHIP) += rk3588-evb1-v10.dtb
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..68b19acb1550
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3588-evb1-v10.dts
> > @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0+ OR MIT)
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2021 Rockchip Electronics Co., Ltd.
> > + *
> > + */
> > +
> > +/dts-v1/;
> > +
> > +#include "rk3588.dtsi"
> > +
> > +/ {
> > + model = "Rockchip RK3588 EVB1 V10 Board";
> > + compatible = "rockchip,rk3588-evb1-v10", "rockchip,rk3588";
> > +
> > + chosen {
> > + stdout-path = "serial2:1500000n8";
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +&sdhci {
> > + bus-width = <8>;
> > + no-sdio;
> > + no-sd;
> > + non-removable;
> > + max-frequency = <200000000>;
> > + mmc-hs400-1_8v;
> > + mmc-hs400-enhanced-strobe;
> > + status = "ok";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&uart2 {
> > + status = "ok";
>
> Usually status goes at the end of properties and rockchip sources use
> "okay" instead of "ok".
"okay" is what's documented in the spec and in the schemas, so please
fix.
No need for reviewers to tell you this though, please run 'make
dtbs_checks' on the dts file and don't add new warnings.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists