[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2181693.iZASKD2KPV@leap>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 20:29:03 +0200
From: "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>,
Martiros Shakhzadyan <vrzh@...h.net>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
outreachy@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: media: atomisp: Use kmap_local_page() in hmm_store()
On giovedì 14 aprile 2022 00:55:31 CEST Fabio M. De Francesco wrote:
> The use of kmap() is being deprecated in favor of kmap_local_page()
> where it is feasible. The same is true for kmap_atomic().
>
> In file pci/hmm/hmm.c, function hmm_store() test if we are in atomic
> context and, if so, it calls kmap_atomic(), if not, it calls kmap().
>
> First of all, in_atomic() shouldn't be used in drivers. This macro
> cannot always detect atomic context; in particular, it cannot know
> about held spinlocks in non-preemptible kernels.
>
> Notwithstanding what it is said above, this code doesn't need to care
> whether or not it is executing in atomic context. It can simply use
> kmap_local_page() / kunmap_local() that can instead do the mapping /
> unmapping regardless of the context.
>
> With kmap_local_page(), the mapping is per thread, CPU local and not
> globally visible. Therefore, hmm_store()() is a function where the use
> of kmap_local_page() in place of both kmap() and kmap_atomic() is
> correctly suited.
>
> Convert the calls of kmap() / kunmap() and kmap_atomic() /
> kunmap_atomic() to kmap_local_page() / kunmap_local() and drop the
> unnecessary tests which test if the code is in atomic context.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio M. De Francesco <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/hmm/hmm.c | 14 ++------------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
Hi Mauro,
I'm writing for just a gentle ping for this and two other staging/atomisp/
patches that still seem to be waiting to be applied.
In the meantime I would like to remind you that Hans de Goede has
successfully tested this patch and the other two on both the front and back
cams of a chuwi hi8 tablet.
Please let me know if there is anything else that is required to be done in
order to accept the three patches.
Thanks,
Fabio M. De Francesco
Powered by blists - more mailing lists