linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] Refactor UMR post send logic

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220425184824.GA2247544@nvidia.com>
Date:   Mon, 25 Apr 2022 15:48:24 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
Cc:     Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
        Aharon Landau <aharonl@...dia.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 00/12] Refactor UMR post send logic

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 10:23:55AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
> 
> Hi,
> 
> UMR are special QPs that require slightly different logic than other
> QPs. This series from Aharon refactors the logic around UMR QP to
> separate file and functions to clean the post send flow.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Aharon Landau (12):
>   RDMA/mlx5: Move init and cleanup of UMR to umr.c
>   RDMA/mlx5: Move umr checks to umr.h
>   RDMA/mlx5: Move mkey ctrl segment logic to umr.c
>   RDMA/mlx5: Simplify get_umr_update_access_mask()
>   RDMA/mlx5: Expose wqe posting helpers outside of wr.c
>   RDMA/mlx5: Introduce mlx5_umr_post_send_wait()
>   RDMA/mlx5: Use mlx5_umr_post_send_wait() to revoke MRs
>   RDMA/mlx5: Use mlx5_umr_post_send_wait() to rereg pd access
>   RDMA/mlx5: Move creation and free of translation tables to umr.c
>   RDMA/mlx5: Use mlx5_umr_post_send_wait() to update MR pas
>   RDMA/mlx5: Use mlx5_umr_post_send_wait() to update xlt
>   RDMA/mlx5: Clean UMR QP type flow from mlx5_ib_post_send()

I moved the static to the earlier patch, but otherwise applied to
for-next, thanks

Jason