[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKwvOdk1nt4b9am=_BP=U3igkSRBN14nx+5oS8iaaw9zhbH5JA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:48:00 -0700
From: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/27] modpost: make multiple export error
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 12:09 PM Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> This is currently a warning, but I think modpost should stop building
> in this case.
>
> If the same symbol is exported multiple times and we let it keep going,
> the sanity check becomes difficult.
>
> Only the legitimate case is that an external module overrides the
> corresponding in-tree module to provide a different implementation
> with the same interface.
Could the same module export a weak version of a symbol, and a strong one?
Can kernel modules override in-kernel strong symbols?
>
> Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
> ---
>
> scripts/mod/modpost.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/mod/modpost.c b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> index 14044cd94aaa..73f0b98e3b5a 100644
> --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> @@ -411,9 +411,9 @@ static struct symbol *sym_add_exported(const char *name, struct module *mod,
> list_add_tail(&s->list, &mod->exported_symbols);
> } else if (!external_module || s->module->is_vmlinux ||
> s->module == mod) {
> - warn("%s: '%s' exported twice. Previous export was in %s%s\n",
> - mod->name, name, s->module->name,
> - s->module->is_vmlinux ? "" : ".ko");
> + error("%s: '%s' exported twice. Previous export was in %s%s\n",
> + mod->name, name, s->module->name,
> + s->module->is_vmlinux ? "" : ".ko");
> return s;
> }
>
> --
> 2.32.0
>
--
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists