[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <SL2PR06MB308217E24459AB685FBF6FD2BDF89@SL2PR06MB3082.apcprd06.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 11:18:21 +0000
From: 王擎 <wangqing@...o.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"peterz@...radead.org" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: [PATCH V2] arm64: add SCHED_CLUSTER's dependency on ACPI
>> From: Wang Qing <wangqing@...o.com>
>>
>> cluster sched_domain configured by cpu_topology[].cluster_sibling,
>> which is set by cluster_id, cluster_id can only get from ACPI.
>>
>> If the system does not enable ACPI, cluster_id is always -1, even enable
>> SCHED_CLUSTER is invalid, this is misleading.
>>
>> So we add SCHED_CLUSTER's dependency on ACPI here.
>>
>
>Any reason why this can't be extended to support DT based systems via
>cpu-map in the device tree. IMO we almost have everything w.r.t topology
>in DT and no reason to deviate this feature between ACPI and DT.
>
That's the problem, we parse out "cluster" info according to the
description in cpu-map, but do assign it to package_id, which used to
configure the MC sched domain, not cluster sched domain.
That is to say, "cluster" in cpu-map is used to describe the package_id.
We can't get cluster_id from DT.
Thanks,
Qing
>--
>Regards,
>Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists