[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220425131308.158635-1-trix@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 09:13:08 -0400
From: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
To: bskeggs@...hat.com, kherbst@...hat.com, lyude@...hat.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] drm/nouveau/disp/gv100: make gv100_disp_wndw and gv100_disp_wndw_mthd static
Sparse reports these issues
wndwgv100.c:120:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_wndw_mthd' was not declared. Should it be static?
wndwgv100.c:140:1: warning: symbol 'gv100_disp_wndw' was not declared. Should it be static?
These variable are only used in wndwgv100.c. Single file variables should be static.
So use static as their storage-class specifiers.
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@...hat.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wndwgv100.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wndwgv100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wndwgv100.c
index 5d3b641dbb14..e635247d794f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wndwgv100.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/disp/wndwgv100.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ gv100_disp_wndw_mthd_base = {
}
};
-const struct nv50_disp_chan_mthd
+static const struct nv50_disp_chan_mthd
gv100_disp_wndw_mthd = {
.name = "Window",
.addr = 0x001000,
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ gv100_disp_wndw_intr(struct nv50_disp_chan *chan, bool en)
nvkm_mask(device, 0x611da4, mask, data);
}
-const struct nv50_disp_chan_func
+static const struct nv50_disp_chan_func
gv100_disp_wndw = {
.init = gv100_disp_dmac_init,
.fini = gv100_disp_dmac_fini,
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists