[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220425144804.GP2462@kadam>
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2022 17:48:05 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] jfs: remove unused pointer tblk
On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 05:13:30PM +0100, Colin Ian King wrote:
> The pointer tlbk is not used, it is redundant and can be removed.
> Cleans up cppcheck warning:
>
> linux/fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c:2551:17: style: Unused variable: tblk [unusedVariable]
>
> Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.i.king@...il.com>
> ---
> fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c b/fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c
> index 3148e9b35f3b..d29979d0a6aa 100644
> --- a/fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c
> +++ b/fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c
> @@ -2548,7 +2548,6 @@ xtRelocate(tid_t tid, struct inode * ip, xad_t * oxad, /* old XAD */
> int xtype)
> { /* extent type: XTPAGE or DATAEXT */
> int rc = 0;
> - struct tblock *tblk;
This would have caused a build error if it weren't ifdeffed out.
#ifdef _STILL_TO_PORT
JFS is an IBM filesystem from OS/2. Apparently, this stuff never got
ported? Probably we could just delete the dead code.
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists