[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <06e0138a526f1fd9fe5b18184163c1ff98f0103b.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:18:55 +0200
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>
To: Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>,
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Serge Schneider <serge@...pberrypi.org>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Mattias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
fedora-rpi@...glegroups.com, Daniel Bauman <dbauman@...hat.com>,
Mwesigwa Guma <mguma@...hat.com>,
Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver
Hi Charles, Miguel,
On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote:
> Hi Miguel—
>
> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up.
>
> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained
> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux-
> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks!
Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I
suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if
we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have
ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers.
I'll do a last review during the week.
Regards,
--
Nicolás Sáenz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists