linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4719fce9-4235-f1d7-f95e-67e5a47a0968@i2se.com>
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 13:48:06 +0200
From:   Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To:     Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
        Charles Mirabile <cmirabil@...hat.com>,
        Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Serge Schneider <serge@...pberrypi.org>,
        Mattias Brugger <mbrugger@...e.com>,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        fedora-rpi@...glegroups.com, Daniel Bauman <dbauman@...hat.com>,
        Mwesigwa Guma <mguma@...hat.com>,
        Joel Savitz <jsavitz@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver

Am 26.04.22 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
> Hi Charles, Miguel,
>
> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote:
>> Hi Miguel—
>>
>> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up.
>>
>> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained
>> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux-
>> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks!
> Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I
> suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if
> we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have
> ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers.
Yes, we still need a Ack of Rob for the device tree bindings. Please 
give him the common 2 weeks for a review.
>
> I'll do a last review during the week.
>
> Regards,
>