linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:03:26 +0000
From:   <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To:     <stefan.wahren@...e.com>, <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
        <cmirabil@...hat.com>, <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <serge@...pberrypi.org>,
        <mbrugger@...e.com>, <linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <fedora-rpi@...glegroups.com>, <dbauman@...hat.com>,
        <mguma@...hat.com>, <jsavitz@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver

On 26/04/2022 12:48, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> Am 26.04.22 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
>> Hi Charles, Miguel,
>>
>> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote:
>>> Hi Miguel—
>>>
>>> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up.
>>>
>>> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained
>>> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux-
>>> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks!
>> Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I
>> suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if
>> we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have
>> ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers.
> Yes, we still need a Ack of Rob for the device tree bindings. Please give him the common 2 weeks for a review.

You have one from Krzysztof on the bindings, that should be sufficient?

https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainers.html#open-firmware-and-flattened-device-tree-bindings

>>
>> I'll do a last review during the week.
>>
>> Regards,
>>