lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 17:12:56 +0200
From:   Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>
To:     Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com, nsaenzju@...hat.com,
        cmirabil@...hat.com, miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, serge@...pberrypi.org,
        mbrugger@...e.com, linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, fedora-rpi@...glegroups.com,
        dbauman@...hat.com, mguma@...hat.com, jsavitz@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/6] Raspberry Pi Sense HAT driver

Am 26.04.22 um 14:03 schrieb Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com:
> On 26/04/2022 12:48, Stefan Wahren wrote:
>> Am 26.04.22 um 12:18 schrieb Nicolas Saenz Julienne:
>>> Hi Charles, Miguel,
>>>
>>> On Mon, 2022-04-25 at 19:34 -0400, Charles Mirabile wrote:
>>>> Hi Miguel—
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your help in reviewing this patch. I think all of the feedback is cleared up.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure which tree this should go into, but maybe the Raspberry Pi tree maintained
>>>> by Nicolas Saenz Julienne (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nsaenz/linux-
>>>> rpi.git)? What do you think? Thanks!
>>> Since there is no code dependency between the different drivers/patches I
>>> suggest for each patch to go through its respective maintainer tree. Also, if
>>> we were to move the whole series through as single tree, it's important to have
>>> ACKs from all the subsystem maintainers.
>> Yes, we still need a Ack of Rob for the device tree bindings. Please give him the common 2 weeks for a review.
> You have one from Krzysztof on the bindings, that should be sufficient?
>
> https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainers.html#open-firmware-and-flattened-device-tree-bindings
Yes, you are right
>
>>> I'll do a last review during the week.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ