[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220426132740.yhthgoazoolvlven@bogus>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 14:27:40 +0100
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: 王擎 <wangqing@...o.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"vincent.guittot@...aro.org" <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
"dietmar.eggemann@....com" <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/2] Add complex scheduler level for arm64
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 07:05:15AM +0000, 王擎 wrote:
>
> Hi Sudeep:
>
> I am thinking if it is possible to add a complex level cpu topology
> between cluster and SMT?
>
> We can describe it directly in “cpu-map”, instead of parsing it through
> the cache info.
>
I don't know or understand what you mean by that. Do you have a proposal
for DT bindings ? Please post the patch with details on the motivation for
the change to help us understand your proposal. I can't comment much without
seeing or understanding your proposal at this moment.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists