linux-kernel - Aw: Re: [RFC/RFT v2 09/11] dt-bindings: pci: add lane-map to rockchip PCIe binding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:27:34 +0200
From:   Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To:     Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc:     Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>,
        linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
        Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        Krzysztof Wilczyński <kw@...ux.com>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
        Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
        Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Aw: Re: [RFC/RFT v2 09/11] dt-bindings: pci: add lane-map to
 rockchip PCIe binding

Hi,

> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. April 2022 um 18:04 Uhr
> Von: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@...nel.org>

> > -  bifurcation: true
> > -
>
> Why are you adding "bifurcation" earlier in the series, then
> immediately removing it?  Why not just add "lane-map" directly and
> never mention "bifurcation" in the DT at all?

The original driver used the bifurcation property with vendor prefix which i have dropped.

In v1 there was an Idea to replace this bifurcation setting by something more
generic supporting more that just true/false. So i added lane-map to start
discussion if this is the right way or if i should leave the bifurcation property.

if the lane-map is right, i squash the commits before the commits should land in linux...
this is one cause i tagged the series as RFC.

regards Frank