[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <trinity-645b0d5b-4366-492c-9cdb-71d9e8664d31-1650994054170@3c-app-gmx-bs69>
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 19:27:34 +0200
From: Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Frank Wunderlich <linux@...web.de>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Michael Riesch <michael.riesch@...fvision.net>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Aw: Re: [RFC/RFT v2 09/11] dt-bindings: pci: add lane-map to
rockchip PCIe binding
Hi,
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. April 2022 um 18:04 Uhr
> Von: "Bjorn Helgaas" <helgaas@...nel.org>
> > - bifurcation: true
> > -
>
> Why are you adding "bifurcation" earlier in the series, then
> immediately removing it? Why not just add "lane-map" directly and
> never mention "bifurcation" in the DT at all?
The original driver used the bifurcation property with vendor prefix which i have dropped.
In v1 there was an Idea to replace this bifurcation setting by something more
generic supporting more that just true/false. So i added lane-map to start
discussion if this is the right way or if i should leave the bifurcation property.
if the lane-map is right, i squash the commits before the commits should land in linux...
this is one cause i tagged the series as RFC.
regards Frank
Powered by blists - more mailing lists