[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <bc18532b-a98f-26f2-4dd1-d189c0415820@acm.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2022 16:53:56 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>, jaegeuk@...nel.org,
axboe@...nel.dk, snitzer@...nel.org, hch@....de, mcgrof@...nel.org,
naohiro.aota@....com, sagi@...mberg.me,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, dsterba@...e.com,
johannes.thumshirn@....com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org,
clm@...com, gost.dev@...sung.com, chao@...nel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, josef@...icpanda.com,
jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev, agk@...hat.com, kbusch@...nel.org,
kch@...dia.com, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, jiangbo.365@...edance.com,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, matias.bjorling@....com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] block: add bdev_zone_no helper
On 4/27/22 09:02, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
> +static inline unsigned int bdev_zone_no(struct block_device *bdev, sector_t sec)
> +{
> + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
> +
> + if (q)
> + return blk_queue_zone_no(q, sec);
> + return 0;
> +}
This patch series has been split incorrectly: the same patch that
introduces a new function should also introduce a caller to that function.
Thanks,
Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists