linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/16] block: add blk_queue_zone_aligned and bdev_zone

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:33:34 +0200
From:   Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
To:     Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
        <axboe@...nel.dk>, <snitzer@...nel.org>, <hch@....de>,
        <mcgrof@...nel.org>, <naohiro.aota@....com>, <sagi@...mberg.me>,
        <damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>, <dsterba@...e.com>,
        <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
CC:     <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <clm@...com>,
        <gost.dev@...sung.com>, <chao@...nel.org>, <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        <jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev>, <agk@...hat.com>,
        <kbusch@...nel.org>, <kch@...dia.com>,
        <linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, <jiangbo.365@...edance.com>,
        <matias.bjorling@....com>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/16] block: add blk_queue_zone_aligned and
 bdev_zone_aligned helper

On 2022-04-28 01:52, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/27/22 09:02, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
>> +static inline bool bdev_zone_aligned(struct block_device *bdev,
>> sector_t sec)
>> +{
>> +    struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>> +
>> +    if (q)
>> +        return blk_queue_zone_aligned(q, sec);
>> +    return false;
>> +}
> 
> Which patch uses this function? I can't find any patch in this series
> that introduces a call to this function.
> 
Initially I used it but at the end I had to remove that patch but I
forgot to remove this function. Thanks for pointing it out. I will fix
it up in the next rev.
> Thanks,
> 
> Bart.
> 
>