[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bbc0766-63b6-3325-fd62-8309290d9edf@samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 17:34:36 +0200
From: Pankaj Raghav <p.raghav@...sung.com>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, <jaegeuk@...nel.org>,
<axboe@...nel.dk>, <snitzer@...nel.org>, <hch@....de>,
<mcgrof@...nel.org>, <naohiro.aota@....com>, <sagi@...mberg.me>,
<damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com>, <dsterba@...e.com>,
<johannes.thumshirn@....com>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <clm@...com>,
<gost.dev@...sung.com>, <chao@...nel.org>, <josef@...icpanda.com>,
<jonathan.derrick@...ux.dev>, <agk@...hat.com>,
<kbusch@...nel.org>, <kch@...dia.com>,
<linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, <jiangbo.365@...edance.com>,
<matias.bjorling@....com>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/16] block: add bdev_zone_no helper
On 2022-04-28 01:53, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On 4/27/22 09:02, Pankaj Raghav wrote:
>> +static inline unsigned int bdev_zone_no(struct block_device *bdev,
>> sector_t sec)
>> +{
>> + struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
>> +
>> + if (q)
>> + return blk_queue_zone_no(q, sec);
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> This patch series has been split incorrectly: the same patch that
> introduces a new function should also introduce a caller to that function.
>
Acked. I will make sure this happens in the next revision. Thanks.
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists