linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: rename print_subtest_{start,end} for clarity (s/subtest/suite)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CABVgOS=_yOGkCfh34K-tiqd4mdJD+gbJOmhurP9-8LouC2WUmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 27 Apr 2022 09:55:54 +0800
From:   David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To:     Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
Cc:     Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        KUnit Development <kunit-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] kunit: rename print_subtest_{start,end} for clarity (s/subtest/suite)

On Wed, Apr 27, 2022 at 2:19 AM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> These names sound more general than they are.
>
> The _end() function increments a `static int kunit_suite_counter`, so it
> can only safely be called on suites, aka top-level subtests.
> It would need to have a separate counter for each level of subtest to be
> generic enough.
>
> So rename it to make it clear it's only appropriate for suites.
>
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>
> ---

Fair enough! This does make more sense now we have more complex hierarchies.

Reviewed-by: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>


>  lib/kunit/test.c | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/kunit/test.c b/lib/kunit/test.c
> index 0f66c13d126e..64ee6a9d8003 100644
> --- a/lib/kunit/test.c
> +++ b/lib/kunit/test.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ size_t kunit_suite_num_test_cases(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
>
> -static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> +static void kunit_print_suite_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
>         kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s",
>                   suite->name);
> @@ -192,7 +192,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_has_succeeded);
>
>  static size_t kunit_suite_counter = 1;
>
> -static void kunit_print_subtest_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
> +static void kunit_print_suite_end(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>  {
>         kunit_print_ok_not_ok((void *)suite, false,
>                               kunit_suite_has_succeeded(suite),
> @@ -498,7 +498,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>         struct kunit_result_stats suite_stats = { 0 };
>         struct kunit_result_stats total_stats = { 0 };
>
> -       kunit_print_subtest_start(suite);
> +       kunit_print_suite_start(suite);
>
>         kunit_suite_for_each_test_case(suite, test_case) {
>                 struct kunit test = { .param_value = NULL, .param_index = 0 };
> @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ int kunit_run_tests(struct kunit_suite *suite)
>         }
>
>         kunit_print_suite_stats(suite, suite_stats, total_stats);
> -       kunit_print_subtest_end(suite);
> +       kunit_print_suite_end(suite);
>
>         return 0;
>  }
>
> base-commit: 59729170afcd4900e08997a482467ffda8d88c7f
> --
> 2.36.0.rc2.479.g8af0fa9b8e-goog
>

Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4003 bytes)