[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YmsIqDPjvZKbbKov@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2022 23:35:36 +0200
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
To: Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
Cc: Wells Lu <wellslutw@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"roopa@...dia.com" <roopa@...dia.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 2/2] net: ethernet: Add driver for Sunplus
SP7021
Wells Lu e..h
3i(0 <wells.lu@...plus.com> :
[...]
> I will add disable_irq() and enable_irq() for spl2sw_rx_poll() and spl2sw_tx_poll() as shown below:
>
> spl2sw_rx_poll():
>
> wmb(); /* make sure settings are effective. */
> disable_irq(comm->irq);
> mask = readl(comm->l2sw_reg_base + L2SW_SW_INT_MASK_0);
> mask &= ~MAC_INT_RX;
> writel(mask, comm->l2sw_reg_base + L2SW_SW_INT_MASK_0);
> enable_irq(comm->irq);
>
> spl2sw_tx_poll():
>
> wmb(); /* make sure settings are effective. */
> disable_irq(comm->irq);
> mask = readl(comm->l2sw_reg_base + L2SW_SW_INT_MASK_0);
> mask &= ~MAC_INT_TX;
> writel(mask, comm->l2sw_reg_base + L2SW_SW_INT_MASK_0);
> enable_irq(comm->irq);
>
>
> Is the modification ok?
disable_irq prevents future irq processing but it does not help against irq
code currently running on a different cpu.
You may use plain spin_{lock / unlock} in IRQ context and
spin_{loq_irqsave / irq_restore} in NAPI context.
--
Ueimor
Powered by blists - more mailing lists