[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c9f1c79f056c4982b6f425a3c3fdcfcd@sphcmbx02.sunplus.com.tw>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 03:46:06 +0000
From: Wells Lu 呂芳騰 <wells.lu@...plus.com>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@...zoreil.com>
CC: Wells Lu <wellslutw@...il.com>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"kuba@...nel.org" <kuba@...nel.org>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"pabeni@...hat.com" <pabeni@...hat.com>,
"krzk+dt@...nel.org" <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
"roopa@...dia.com" <roopa@...dia.com>,
"andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>,
"edumazet@...gle.com" <edumazet@...gle.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v9 2/2] net: ethernet: Add driver for Sunplus
SP7021
Hi Francois,
> [...]
> > I will add disable_irq() and enable_irq() for spl2sw_rx_poll() and spl2sw_tx_poll()
> as shown below:
> >
> > spl2sw_rx_poll():
> >
> > wmb(); /* make sure settings are effective. */
> > disable_irq(comm->irq);
> > mask = readl(comm->l2sw_reg_base + L2SW_SW_INT_MASK_0);
> > mask &= ~MAC_INT_RX;
> > writel(mask, comm->l2sw_reg_base + L2SW_SW_INT_MASK_0);
> > enable_irq(comm->irq);
> >
> > spl2sw_tx_poll():
> >
> > wmb(); /* make sure settings are effective. */
> > disable_irq(comm->irq);
> > mask = readl(comm->l2sw_reg_base + L2SW_SW_INT_MASK_0);
> > mask &= ~MAC_INT_TX;
> > writel(mask, comm->l2sw_reg_base + L2SW_SW_INT_MASK_0);
> > enable_irq(comm->irq);
> >
> >
> > Is the modification ok?
>
> disable_irq prevents future irq processing but it does not help against irq code currently
> running on a different cpu.
>
> You may use plain spin_{lock / unlock} in IRQ context and spin_{loq_irqsave / irq_restore}
> in NAPI context.
>
> --
> Ueimor
Thank you for teaching me how to fix the issue.
I'll add them next patch.
Best regards,
Wells
Powered by blists - more mailing lists