[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3a6cc645-4e23-6ca0-b07e-37ff8660c1a7@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 10:27:23 +0100
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org>
To: cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmem: qfprom: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of
pm_runtime_get_sync
On 11/04/2022 02:40, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
>
> Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate
> for simplifing code
>
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
Applied thanks,
--srini
> ---
> drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c | 3 +--
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> index 162132c7dab9..c1e893c8a247 100644
> --- a/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> +++ b/drivers/nvmem/qfprom.c
> @@ -217,9 +217,8 @@ static int qfprom_enable_fuse_blowing(const struct qfprom_priv *priv,
> goto err_clk_rate_set;
> }
>
> - ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
> + ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(priv->dev);
> if (ret < 0) {
> - pm_runtime_put_noidle(priv->dev);
> dev_err(priv->dev, "Failed to enable power-domain\n");
> goto err_reg_enable;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists