| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <YnFwiLkvYtLn43Qv@myrica>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2022 19:12:24 +0100
From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
To: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Eric Auger <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
Liu Yi L <yi.l.liu@...el.com>,
Jacob jun Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 07/12] arm-smmu-v3/sva: Add SVA domain support
On Mon, May 02, 2022 at 09:48:37AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Add support for SVA domain allocation and provide an SVA-specific
> iommu_domain_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 14 +++++++
> .../iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 21 ++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index cd48590ada30..7631c00fdcbd 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -759,6 +759,10 @@ struct iommu_sva *arm_smmu_sva_bind(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm,
> void arm_smmu_sva_unbind(struct iommu_sva *handle);
> u32 arm_smmu_sva_get_pasid(struct iommu_sva *handle);
> void arm_smmu_sva_notifier_synchronize(void);
> +int arm_smmu_sva_attach_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, ioasid_t id);
> +void arm_smmu_sva_detach_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, ioasid_t id);
> #else /* CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA */
> static inline bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> @@ -804,5 +808,15 @@ static inline u32 arm_smmu_sva_get_pasid(struct iommu_sva *handle)
> }
>
> static inline void arm_smmu_sva_notifier_synchronize(void) {}
> +
> +static inline int arm_smmu_sva_attach_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, ioasid_t id)
> +{
> + return -ENODEV;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void arm_smmu_sva_detach_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev,
> + ioasid_t id) {}
> #endif /* CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA */
> #endif /* _ARM_SMMU_V3_H */
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> index c623dae1e115..3b843cd3ed67 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-sva.c
> @@ -541,3 +541,45 @@ void arm_smmu_sva_notifier_synchronize(void)
> */
> mmu_notifier_synchronize();
> }
> +
> +int arm_smmu_sva_attach_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, ioasid_t id)
> +{
> + int ret = 0;
> + struct iommu_sva *handle;
> + struct mm_struct *mm = iommu_sva_domain_mm(domain);
> +
> + if (domain->type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA || !mm)
We wouldn't get that far with a non-SVA domain since iommu_sva_domain_mm()
would dereference a NULL pointer. Could you move it after the domain->type
check, and maybe add a WARN_ON()? It could help catch issues in future
API changes.
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sva_lock);
> + handle = __arm_smmu_sva_bind(dev, mm);
> + if (IS_ERR(handle))
> + ret = PTR_ERR(handle);
> + mutex_unlock(&sva_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +void arm_smmu_sva_detach_dev_pasid(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> + struct device *dev, ioasid_t id)
> +{
> + struct arm_smmu_bond *bond = NULL, *t;
> + struct mm_struct *mm = iommu_sva_domain_mm(domain);
> + struct arm_smmu_master *master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&sva_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry(t, &master->bonds, list) {
> + if (t->mm == mm) {
> + bond = t;
> + break;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (!WARN_ON(!bond) && refcount_dec_and_test(&bond->refs)) {
> + list_del(&bond->list);
> + arm_smmu_mmu_notifier_put(bond->smmu_mn);
> + kfree(bond);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&sva_lock);
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index afc63fce6107..bd80de0bad98 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -1995,10 +1995,31 @@ static bool arm_smmu_capable(enum iommu_cap cap)
> }
> }
>
> +static void arm_smmu_sva_domain_free(struct iommu_domain *domain)
> +{
> + kfree(domain);
> +}
> +
> +static const struct iommu_domain_ops arm_smmu_sva_domain_ops = {
> + .attach_dev_pasid = arm_smmu_sva_attach_dev_pasid,
> + .detach_dev_pasid = arm_smmu_sva_detach_dev_pasid,
> + .free = arm_smmu_sva_domain_free,
> +};
> +
> static struct iommu_domain *arm_smmu_domain_alloc(unsigned type)
> {
> struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain;
>
> + if (type == IOMMU_DOMAIN_SVA) {
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> +
> + domain = kzalloc(sizeof(*domain), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (domain)
> + domain->ops = &arm_smmu_sva_domain_ops;
> +
> + return domain;
> + }
> +
I'd prefer moving all of this to arm-smmu-v3-sva.c and just call
arm_smmu_sva_domain_alloc() here
Otherwise the patch looks fine. I'll rework the driver when I find some
time, because we can now remove arm_smmu_bond and move smmu_mn to the SVA
domain, maybe also remove sva_lock but I haven't thought it through.
Thanks,
Jean
> if (type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_UNMANAGED &&
> type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA &&
> type != IOMMU_DOMAIN_DMA_FQ &&
> --
> 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists