linux-kernel - Re: Regression: CIFS umount fails since 14302ee33 with some servers (exit code 32)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64a7de55-8f93-8e7a-4102-26f7d4dbe1dc@pre-sense.de>
Date:   Wed, 4 May 2022 18:12:22 +0200
From:   Moritz Duge <duge@...-sense.de>
To:     Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
        "Paulo Alcantara (SUSE)" <pc@....nz>
Cc:     "regressions@...ts.linux.dev" <regressions@...ts.linux.dev>,
        Aurelien Aptel <aaptel@...e.com>,
        Ronnie Sahlberg <lsahlber@...hat.com>,
        Steve French <stfrench@...rosoft.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Regression: CIFS umount fails since 14302ee33 with some servers
 (exit code 32)

Hi Thorsten,

I'm still waiting for a reply from Paul.

I'm not a kernel developer and I reported everything I know about
the bug. Including the result of a Git bisect, showing the
problematic commit.

So currently I don't see much else I can do.


Kind regards,
Moritz


Am 04.05.22 um 15:19 schrieb Thorsten Leemhuis:
> Hi, this is your Linux kernel regression tracker. Top-posting for once,
> to make this easily accessible to everyone.
> 
> Paul, Moritz, what's the status here? It seems nothing happened at all
> since below mail. Was the issue fixed? Or did it fall through the cracks?
> 
> Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
> 
> P.S.: As the Linux kernel's regression tracker I deal with a lot of
> reports and sometimes miss something important when writing mails like
> this. If that's the case here, don't hesitate to tell me in a public
> reply, it's in everyone's interest to set the public record straight.
> 
> #regzbot poke

Download attachment "OpenPGP_0x8F88310D16CDB92E.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (3932 bytes)

Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)