lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VBqbhB03uPtnzYdRHhU-4TnX6RgDpHK27RUXY84esebw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 3 May 2022 20:30:23 -0700
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Sai Prakash Ranjan <quic_saipraka@...cinc.com>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>, matvore@...omium.org,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: qcom: socinfo: Add another ID for sc7180

Hi,

On Tue, May 3, 2022 at 7:14 PM Sai Prakash Ranjan
<quic_saipraka@...cinc.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 5/3/2022 6:03 AM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> > It appears the some sc7180 devices, like the one in my
> > sc7180-trogdor-homestar, report an ID of 407 instead of 425. Add
> > another ID into the list.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > ---
> >
> >   drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> > index cee579a267a6..2ef1dc2a1dd3 100644
> > --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> > +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/socinfo.c
> > @@ -318,6 +318,7 @@ static const struct soc_id soc_id[] = {
> >       { 396, "IPQ8071A" },
> >       { 402, "IPQ6018" },
> >       { 403, "IPQ6028" },
> > +     { 407, "SC7180" },
> >       { 421, "IPQ6000" },
> >       { 422, "IPQ6010" },
> >       { 425, "SC7180" },
>
> Hmm, this ID maps to SM6250 which is a mobile variant. Not sure we should
> use it for SC7180 which already has 425 ID assigned, perks of marketing :)

That's super weird. Any idea why my strongbad reports 407 then? Is it
a firmware bug, or someone misprogrammed something? What can we do to
make the CPU recognized in strongbad?

...and just for extra info, I believe strongbad actually has the
slightly faster version of sc7180. It has a higher GPU/CPU speed. In
some places I've heard it called sc7185, but in other places I've
heard it called just sc7180 with a faster clock speed...

-Doug

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ