lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220504153127.535820605@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Wed,  4 May 2022 18:47:12 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>,
        Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.17 194/225] btrfs: zoned: use dedicated lock for data relocation

From: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>

commit 5f0addf7b89085f8e0a2593faa419d6111612b9b upstream.

Currently, we use btrfs_inode_{lock,unlock}() to grant an exclusive
writeback of the relocation data inode in
btrfs_zoned_data_reloc_{lock,unlock}(). However, that can cause a deadlock
in the following path.

Thread A takes btrfs_inode_lock() and waits for metadata reservation by
e.g, waiting for writeback:

prealloc_file_extent_cluster()
  - btrfs_inode_lock(&inode->vfs_inode, 0);
  - btrfs_prealloc_file_range()
  ...
    - btrfs_replace_file_extents()
      - btrfs_start_transaction
      ...
        - btrfs_reserve_metadata_bytes()

Thread B (e.g, doing a writeback work) needs to wait for the inode lock to
continue writeback process:

do_writepages
  - btrfs_writepages
    - extent_writpages
      - btrfs_zoned_data_reloc_lock(BTRFS_I(inode));
        - btrfs_inode_lock()

The deadlock is caused by relying on the vfs_inode's lock. By using it, we
introduced unnecessary exclusion of writeback and
btrfs_prealloc_file_range(). Also, the lock at this point is useless as we
don't have any dirty pages in the inode yet.

Introduce fs_info->zoned_data_reloc_io_lock and use it for the exclusive
writeback.

Fixes: 35156d852762 ("btrfs: zoned: only allow one process to add pages to a relocation inode")
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.16.x: 869f4cdc73f9: btrfs: zoned: encapsulate inode locking for zoned relocation
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.16.x
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.17
Cc: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@....com>
Signed-off-by: Naohiro Aota <naohiro.aota@....com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/ctree.h   |    1 +
 fs/btrfs/disk-io.c |    1 +
 fs/btrfs/zoned.h   |    4 ++--
 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/ctree.h
@@ -1029,6 +1029,7 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
 	 */
 	spinlock_t relocation_bg_lock;
 	u64 data_reloc_bg;
+	struct mutex zoned_data_reloc_io_lock;
 
 	spinlock_t zone_active_bgs_lock;
 	struct list_head zone_active_bgs;
--- a/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
@@ -3068,6 +3068,7 @@ void btrfs_init_fs_info(struct btrfs_fs_
 	mutex_init(&fs_info->reloc_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&fs_info->delalloc_root_mutex);
 	mutex_init(&fs_info->zoned_meta_io_lock);
+	mutex_init(&fs_info->zoned_data_reloc_io_lock);
 	seqlock_init(&fs_info->profiles_lock);
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&fs_info->dirty_cowonly_roots);
--- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.h
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.h
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@ static inline void btrfs_zoned_data_relo
 	struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
 
 	if (btrfs_is_data_reloc_root(root) && btrfs_is_zoned(root->fs_info))
-		btrfs_inode_lock(&inode->vfs_inode, 0);
+		mutex_lock(&root->fs_info->zoned_data_reloc_io_lock);
 }
 
 static inline void btrfs_zoned_data_reloc_unlock(struct btrfs_inode *inode)
@@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static inline void btrfs_zoned_data_relo
 	struct btrfs_root *root = inode->root;
 
 	if (btrfs_is_data_reloc_root(root) && btrfs_is_zoned(root->fs_info))
-		btrfs_inode_unlock(&inode->vfs_inode, 0);
+		mutex_unlock(&root->fs_info->zoned_data_reloc_io_lock);
 }
 
 #endif


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ