linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: simplify the return expression of sgx_drv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 5 May 2022 10:31:41 -0700
From:   Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com, jarkko@...nel.org
Cc:     dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/sgx: simplify the return expression of sgx_drv_init()

On 5/4/22 19:16, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>
> 
> Simplify the return expression.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@....com.cn>

Folks, I'd really encourage you to spend your time elsewhere.  These
"cleanup" or "simplify" patches as a whole have high rates of bugs.  I
don't trust them.  Plus, they don't really make the code easier to
understand.