[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220506141213.GA23485@willie-the-truck>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 15:12:14 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Srinivasarao Pathipati <quic_c_spathi@...cinc.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
acme@...nel.org, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...nel.org, namhyung@...nel.org, catalin.marinas@....com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] arm64: perf: Retain PMCR.X of PMCR_EL0 during reset
On Fri, Apr 29, 2022 at 04:59:09PM +0530, Srinivasarao Pathipati wrote:
> Preserve the bit PMCR.X of PMCR_EL0 during PMU reset to export
> PMU events. as it could be set before PMU initialization.
>
> Signed-off-by: Srinivasarao Pathipati <quic_c_spathi@...cinc.com>
> ---
> Changes since V1:
> - Preserving only PMCR_X bit as per Robin Murphy's comment
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> index cb69ff1..532a417 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/perf_event.c
> @@ -1047,6 +1047,9 @@ static void armv8pmu_reset(void *info)
> if (armv8pmu_has_long_event(cpu_pmu))
> pmcr |= ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_LP;
>
> + /* Preserve PMCR_X to export PMU events */
> + pmcr |= (armv8pmu_pmcr_read() & ARMV8_PMU_PMCR_X);
I don't think this should be unconditional. Exporting events could easily
result in additional power consumption, and potentially even hardware
lockups.
Please stick this behind something like a sysctl toggle or sysfs control,
with documentation about what it does. It should default to disabled.
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists