[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnYu1XGeyRvMn77g@kroah.com>
Date: Sat, 7 May 2022 10:33:25 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc: lizhe <sensor1010@....com>, lee.jones@...aro.org,
fthain@...ux-m68k.org, akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
jjherne@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com, hca@...ux.ibm.com,
gor@...ux.ibm.com, agordeev@...ux.ibm.com,
borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com, svens@...ux.ibm.com, jejb@...ux.ibm.com,
martin.petersen@...cle.com, zbr@...emap.net, perex@...ex.cz,
tiwai@...e.com, bvanassche@....org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org, wens@...e.org,
colin.king@...el.com, hare@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, target-devel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/drivers: Remove redundant driver match function
On Sat, May 07, 2022 at 10:21:37AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 09:59:52PM -0700, lizhe wrote:
> > If there is no driver match function, the driver core assumes that each
> > candidate pair (driver, device) matches, see driver_match_device().
>
> I wonder who is supposed to apply this patch. Either it should be split
> by file and go in via the respective maintainers, or it goes in via
> Greg's tree? I added Greg to To: for him to chime in.
It should be split up into each subsystem patch and submitted that way.
> Best regards
> Uwe
>
> > Signed-off-by: lizhe <sensor1010@....com>
We also need a "real name" here that is used to sign legal documents. I
doubt an all-lower-case name is used that way, so I have to ask.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists