[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnmXX0DldjhmbjY3@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 17:36:15 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
Cc: allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com,
chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
ikjn@...omium.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
matthias.bgg@...il.com, matthias.bgg@...nel.org,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Remove msdc binding
of mt8192 clock
On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 01:31:11PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
> Hi Rob,
>
> >> From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
> >>
> >> The msdc gate is part of the MMC driver. Delete the binding description
> >> of this node.
> >
> >An ABI break is okay because ...?
>
> Sorry for that,
>
> If the mediatek,mt8192-msdc part is removed from the driver,
That's an ABI break too. You just need to explain why as Matthias did in
the commit message if the ABI break is okay.
> Is it ok to keep "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" in the binding document? or
> we should add '# deprecated' to "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" and keep the example.
We do that sometimes, but depends on the situation.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists