lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220509231808.7657-1-miles.chen@mediatek.com>
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 07:18:08 +0800
From:   Miles Chen <miles.chen@...iatek.com>
To:     <robh@...nel.org>
CC:     <allen-kh.cheng@...iatek.com>,
        <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
        <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        <ikjn@...omium.org>, <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
        <matthias.bgg@...nel.org>, <miles.chen@...iatek.com>,
        <mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: ARM: Mediatek: Remove msdc binding of mt8192 clock

Hi Rob,

>On Thu, May 05, 2022 at 01:31:11PM +0800, Miles Chen wrote:
>> Hi Rob,
>> 
>> >> From: Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>
>> >> 
>> >> The msdc gate is part of the MMC driver. Delete the binding description
>> >> of this node.
>> > 
>> >An ABI break is okay because ...?
>> 
>> Sorry for that, 
>> 
>> If the mediatek,mt8192-msdc part is removed from the driver, 
>
>That's an ABI break too. You just need to explain why as Matthias did in 
>the commit message if the ABI break is okay.

Thanks for your explanation.

I would like to learn more about this. In this case
If there was a user (say xxx.c) but the user was removed, can I remove mediatek,mt8192-msdc?

thanks,
Miles

>
>> Is it ok to keep "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" in the binding document? or 
>> we should add '# deprecated' to "mediatek,mt8192-msdc" and keep the example.
>
>We do that sometimes, but depends on the situation.
>
>Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ