[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3594222.Ivq9XVSPaC@archbook>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 11:24:50 +0200
From: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@...il.com>
To: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc: Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel@...labora.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: media: rockchip-vpu: Add RK3568 VEPU compatible
On Montag, 9. Mai 2022 09:25:23 CEST Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 08/05/2022 22:25, Nicolas Frattaroli wrote:
> > The RK3568 and RK3566 have a Hantro VPU node solely dedicated to
> > encoding. This patch adds a compatible for it, and also allows
> > the bindings to only come with a vepu interrupt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Frattaroli <frattaroli.nicolas@...il.com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
> > index bacb60a34989..4045f107ca4e 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/rockchip-vpu.yaml
> > @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ properties:
> > - rockchip,rk3288-vpu
> > - rockchip,rk3328-vpu
> > - rockchip,rk3399-vpu
> > + - rockchip,rk3568-vepu
> > - rockchip,px30-vpu
> > - items:
> > - const: rockchip,rk3188-vpu
> > @@ -40,6 +41,7 @@ properties:
> > interrupt-names:
> > oneOf:
> > - const: vdpu
> > + - const: vepu
>
> This should be enum (for both lines above) and you should add
> allOf:if:then with a constraints which variant can have which interrupts.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
So something like this?
interrupt-names:
oneOf:
- enum:
- vdpu
- vepu
- items:
- const: vepu
- const: vdpu
What's the difference between a list of consts and an enum here?
I'm not very familiar with dt-schema, my apologies.
Also, since I don't know which of the other variants can have
the encoding interrupt and this wasn't brought up until now, I think
my solution will be to have a check for -vepu in the compatible and in
that case require that only the vepu interrupt is present, if that's
alright with you.
Regards,
Nicolas Frattaroli
Powered by blists - more mailing lists