[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DB9PR10MB58815BA44641534DAA6646B6E0C69@DB9PR10MB5881.EURPRD10.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM>
Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 11:10:15 +0000
From: "Starke, Daniel" <daniel.starke@...mens.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 3/3] tty: n_gsm: fix invalid gsmtty_write_room() result
> > +#define TX_SIZE 4096 /* Must be power of 2. */
>
> Only that I'd not put the macro definition here. But outside the structure.
>
> > struct kfifo fifo; /* Queue fifo for the DLCI */
I have placed it at the field which it affects the same way as the original
author placed TX_THRESH_HI and TX_THRESH_LO at tx_list within struct gsm_mux.
I can resubmit this patch, but it was already included in the tty-linux
branch. Please let me know your opinion on this.
Best regards,
Daniel Starke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists