[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8060906.T7Z3S40VBb@diego>
Date: Mon, 09 May 2022 13:10:12 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: krzk+dt@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
Conor Dooley <mail@...chuod.ie>
Cc: conor.dooley@...rochip.com, Cyril.Jean@...rochip.com,
daire.mcnamara@...rochip.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
aou@...s.berkeley.edu, palmer@...osinc.com, arnd@...db.de,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] riscv: dts: microchip: add the sundance polarberry
Am Mittwoch, 4. Mai 2022, 22:30:52 CEST schrieb Conor Dooley:
> From: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
>
> Add a minimal device tree for the PolarFire SoC based Sundance
> PolarBerry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile | 1 +
> .../dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry-fabric.dtsi | 16 +++
> .../boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry.dts | 97 +++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 114 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry-fabric.dtsi
> create mode 100644 arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry.dts
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> index af3a5059b350..39aae7b04f1c 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE) += mpfs-icicle-kit.dtb
> +dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_MICROCHIP_POLARFIRE) += mpfs-polarberry.dtb
> obj-$(CONFIG_BUILTIN_DTB) += $(addsuffix .o, $(dtb-y))
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry-fabric.dtsi b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry-fabric.dtsi
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..49380c428ec9
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry-fabric.dtsi
> @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020-2022 Microchip Technology Inc */
> +
> +/ {
> + fabric_clk3: fabric-clk3 {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + clock-frequency = <62500000>;
> + };
> +
> + fabric_clk1: fabric-clk1 {
> + compatible = "fixed-clock";
> + #clock-cells = <0>;
> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
> + };
> +};
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry.dts b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry.dts
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..1cad5b0d42e1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/riscv/boot/dts/microchip/mpfs-polarberry.dts
> @@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0 OR MIT)
> +/* Copyright (c) 2020-2022 Microchip Technology Inc */
> +
> +/dts-v1/;
> +
> +#include "mpfs.dtsi"
> +#include "mpfs-polarberry-fabric.dtsi"
> +
> +/* Clock frequency (in Hz) of the rtcclk */
> +#define MTIMER_FREQ 1000000
> +
> +/ {
> + model = "Sundance PolarBerry";
> + compatible = "sundance,polarberry", "microchip,mpfs";
> +
> + aliases {
> + ethernet0 = &mac1;
> + serial0 = &mmuart0;
> + };
> +
> + chosen {
> + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> + };
> +
> + cpus {
> + timebase-frequency = <MTIMER_FREQ>;
> + };
> +
> + ddrc_cache_lo: memory@...00000 {
> + device_type = "memory";
> + reg = <0x0 0x80000000 0x0 0x2e000000>;
> + };
> +
> + ddrc_cache_hi: memory@...0000000 {
> + device_type = "memory";
> + reg = <0x10 0x00000000 0x0 0xC0000000>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * phy0 is connected to mac0, but the port itself is on the (optional) carrier
> + * board.
> + */
> +&mac0 {
> + status = "disabled";
> + phy-mode = "sgmii";
> + phy-handle = <&phy0>;
nit: it makes it was easier recognizing the status if it's in the
same place all the time (for example as the last property)
like in &mmc below.
Though that may just be my preference ;-) .
The other option would be to adhere to stricter sorting
because right now status is neither in one place nor sorted.
> +};
> +
> +&mac1 {
> + status = "okay";
> + phy-mode = "sgmii";
> + phy-handle = <&phy1>;
nit (1): same as above
nit (2): blank line between properties and subnodes makes
everything more readable.
> + phy1: ethernet-phy@5 {
> + reg = <5>;
> + ti,fifo-depth = <0x01>;
> + };
nit: blank line?
Otherwise:
Reviewed-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
> + phy0: ethernet-phy@4 {
> + reg = <4>;
> + ti,fifo-depth = <0x01>;
> + };
> +};
> +
> +&mbox {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&mmc {
> + bus-width = <4>;
> + disable-wp;
> + cap-sd-highspeed;
> + cap-mmc-highspeed;
> + card-detect-delay = <200>;
> + mmc-ddr-1_8v;
> + mmc-hs200-1_8v;
> + sd-uhs-sdr12;
> + sd-uhs-sdr25;
> + sd-uhs-sdr50;
> + sd-uhs-sdr104;
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&mmuart0 {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&refclk {
> + clock-frequency = <125000000>;
> +};
> +
> +&rtc {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
> +
> +&syscontroller {
> + status = "okay";
> +};
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists