linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fbdev: Prevent possible use-after-free in fb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <71ebd5f7-64d0-510a-6f1b-29921fca19fa@suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 10 May 2022 10:50:26 +0200
From:   Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
To:     Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
        Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
        Helge Deller <deller@....de>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] fbdev: Prevent possible use-after-free in
 fb_release()

Hi

Am 10.05.22 um 10:37 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann:
...
>>>
>>> You have to go through all DRM drivers that call drm_fb_helper_fini()
>>> and make sure that they free fb_info. For example armada appears to be
>>> leaking now. [1]
>>>
>>
>> But shouldn't fb_info be freed when unregister_framebuffer() is called
>> through drm_dev_unregister() ? AFAICT the call chain is the following:
>>
>> drm_put_dev()
>>    drm_dev_unregister()
>>      drm_client_dev_unregister()
>>        drm_fbdev_client_unregister()
>>          drm_fb_helper_unregister_fbi()
>>            unregister_framebuffer()
>>              do_unregister_framebuffer()
>>                put_fb_info()
>>                  drm_fbdev_fb_destroy()
>>                    framebuffer_release()
>>
>> which is the reason why I believe that drm_fb_helper_fini() should be
>> an internal static function and only called from drm_fbdev_fb_destroy().
>>
>> Drivers shouldn't really explicitly call this helper in my opinion.

One more stupid question: does armada actually use 
drm_fbdev_fb_destroy()? It's supposed to be a callback for struct 
fb_ops. Armada uses it's own instance of fb_ops, which apparently 
doesn't contain fb_destroy. [1]

Best regards
Thomas

[1] 
https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.17.6/source/drivers/gpu/drm/armada/armada_fbdev.c#L19


> 
> Thanks.  That makes sense.
> 
> Best regards
> Thomas
> 
> 
>>
> 

-- 
Thomas Zimmermann
Graphics Driver Developer
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
(HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg)
Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev

Download attachment "OpenPGP_signature" of type "application/pgp-signature" (841 bytes)