[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220511161003.GE10145@plvision.eu>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:10:03 +0300
From: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
To: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, andrew@...n.ch,
gregory.clement@...tlin.com, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
kostap@...vell.com, robert.marko@...tura.hr
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: dts: marvell: Add Armada 98DX2530 SoC and
RD-AC5X board
Hi Chris,
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile | 1 +
> .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-98dx2530.dtsi | 310 ++++++++++++++++++
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/rd-ac5x.dts | 90 +++++
> 3 files changed, 401 insertions(+)
Marvell is going to start the upstreaming of AC5X boards support, we have also patches with similar .dts(i) files
but with different naming:
ac5.dtsi
ac5_rd.dts
ac5_db.dts
ac5x_db.dts
What do you think about to use these naming scheme ?
Regards,
Vadym Kochan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists