[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YnviMOtXX+us+IA4@lunn.ch>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 18:20:00 +0200
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To: Vadym Kochan <vadym.kochan@...ision.eu>
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, gregory.clement@...tlin.com,
sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com, kostap@...vell.com,
robert.marko@...tura.hr, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
Elad Nachman <enachman@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/2] arm64: dts: marvell: Add Armada 98DX2530 SoC and
RD-AC5X board
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 07:10:03PM +0300, Vadym Kochan wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/Makefile | 1 +
> > .../boot/dts/marvell/armada-98dx2530.dtsi | 310 ++++++++++++++++++
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell/rd-ac5x.dts | 90 +++++
> > 3 files changed, 401 insertions(+)
>
> Marvell is going to start the upstreaming of AC5X boards support, we have also patches with similar .dts(i) files
> but with different naming:
>
> ac5.dtsi
> ac5_rd.dts
> ac5_db.dts
> ac5x_db.dts
>
> What do you think about to use these naming scheme ?
Chris has done all the hard work, he gets to pick the naming. And get
his files merged first.
However, now that i come to look in arch/arm64/boot/dts/marvell, i
think most of the current filenames proposed don't match the current names.
armada-98dx2530.dtsi fits the current pattern.
However, Chris's board files should probably be
armada-98dx2530-rd.dts
and the other files should be
armada-98dx2530-db.dts
armada-98dx2530-x-db.dts
What does the x in x_db mean? Does that refer to the board or the SoC?
Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists