linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RESEND v11] platform/chrome: Add ChromeOS ACPI device driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 21:29:46 +0500
From:   Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
To:     Guenter Roeck <groeck@...gle.com>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     usama.anjum@...labora.com, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
        Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
        Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
        Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>, vbendeb@...omium.org,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
        Ayman Bagabas <ayman.bagabas@...il.com>,
        Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
        Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@...n.io>,
        Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
        Jeremy Soller <jeremy@...tem76.com>,
        Mattias Jacobsson <2pi@....nu>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
        Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
        Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
        Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v11] platform/chrome: Add ChromeOS ACPI device
 driver

On 5/11/22 9:23 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 8:59 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
>>>> +#define GPIO_ATTR_GROUP(_group, _name, _num)                                           \
>>>> +       static umode_t attr_is_visible_gpio_##_num(struct kobject *kobj,                \
>>>> +                                                  struct attribute *attr, int n)       \
>>>> +       {                                                                               \
>>>> +               if (_num < chromeos_acpi_gpio_groups)                                   \
>>>> +                       return attr->mode;                                              \
>>>
>>>> +               else                                                                    \
>>>
>>> Redundant.
>> We are deciding on run time that how many GPIO attribute groups need to
>> be shown. chromeos_acpi_gpio_groups is set at run time. I don't see why
>> `else` can be redundant here.
>>
> 
> else after return is _always_ unnecessary (and results in static
> analyzer messages).
> 
Got it. I'll update. Thank you.

-- 
Muhammad Usama Anjum