[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VcQYncfCv-2GE0a0e=0iOLBC6wMvoH8pFCirN3NyLzdhw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 19:40:31 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@...labora.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Mark Gross <markgross@...nel.org>,
Benson Leung <bleung@...omium.org>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Collabora Kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>,
Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>, vbendeb@...omium.org,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Ayman Bagabas <ayman.bagabas@...il.com>,
Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>,
Blaž Hrastnik <blaz@...n.io>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Jeremy Soller <jeremy@...tem76.com>,
Mattias Jacobsson <2pi@....nu>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+samsung@...nel.org>,
Rajat Jain <rajatja@...gle.com>,
Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v11] platform/chrome: Add ChromeOS ACPI device driver
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 5:59 PM Muhammad Usama Anjum
<usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
> On 5/10/22 2:33 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 8:44 AM Muhammad Usama Anjum
> > <usama.anjum@...labora.com> wrote:
...
> >> + static struct attribute *attrs_##_group[] = { \
> >> + &dev_attr_0_##_group.attr, \
> >> + &dev_attr_1_##_group.attr, \
> >> + &dev_attr_2_##_group.attr, \
> >> + &dev_attr_3_##_group.attr, \
> >> + NULL \
(1)
> >> + }; \
> >> + static const struct attribute_group attr_group_##_group = { \
> >> + .name = _name, \
> >> + .is_visible = attr_is_visible_gpio_##_num, \
> >
> >> + .attrs = attrs_##_group \
> >
> > Keep a comma here.
> Is there any particular reason for it?
Yes, if it's not a terminator entry, like (1), the comma would help to
avoid unneeded churm in the future in case someone wants to add
another initialization member.
> If there is, I'll add commas to
> all the structures.
It depends if it is a terminator entry or not, so please check
carefully where to add and where not (the latter example is (1) where
comma is not needed and theoretically might add a confusion).
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists