linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: hv: Fix interrupt mapping for multi-MSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220511183848.GA799494@bhelgaas>
Date:   Wed, 11 May 2022 13:38:48 -0500
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@...cinc.com>
Cc:     kys@...rosoft.com, haiyangz@...rosoft.com, sthemmin@...rosoft.com,
        wei.liu@...nel.org, decui@...rosoft.com, lorenzo.pieralisi@....com,
        robh@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
        jakeo@...rosoft.com, dazhan@...rosoft.com,
        linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] PCI: hv: Fix interrupt mapping for multi-MSI

On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 01:36:51PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> In the subject, "Fix interrupt mapping ..." is too general.  Almost
> all patches "fix" something, so all we learn is that this is something
> to do with multi-MSI.  It's better if you can say something specific,
> like the fact that you now ensure that multi-MSI vectors are aligned
> and consecutive.

I see that the message threading was messed up (ideally each of the
patches would be a response to the [0/2] cover letter), so I didn't
see that this has already been applied.  Sorry for the noise.

Bjorn