[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87h75wgycl.ffs@tglx>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2022 12:25:30 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] x86/entry: Move PTI_USER_* to
arch/x86/include/asm/processor-flags.h
On Wed, May 11 2022 at 15:27, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> From: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshan.ljs@...group.com>
>
> These constants will be also used in C file.
>
> Move them to arch/x86/include/asm/processor-flags.h which already has
> a kin X86_CR3_PTI_PCID_USER_BIT defined in it.
>
> Remove PTI_PGTABLE_SWITCH_BIT and replace it with PTI_USER_PGTABLE_BIT
> since they are the same in meaning and value.
Just from looking at the patch it's obvious that it breaks the 32bit
CONFIG_PAGETABLE_ISOLATION=y build. Sigh.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists