linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Modify some code about kprobe

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220512161054.GE14475@alpha.franken.de>
Date:   Thu, 12 May 2022 18:10:54 +0200
From:   Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To:     Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@...ngson.cn>
Cc:     Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] Modify some code about kprobe

On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 07:02:01PM +0800, Tiezhu Yang wrote:
> v3: no need to change post_kprobe_handler() in patch #2 now,
>     sorry for the carelessness.
> 
> v2:
>   -- only replace __kprobes with NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() in patch #2
>   -- update the commit messages
> 
> Tiezhu Yang (2):
>   selftests/ftrace: Save kprobe_events to test log
>   MIPS: Use NOKPROBE_SYMBOL() instead of __kprobes annotation
> 
>  arch/mips/kernel/kprobes.c                         | 36 ++++++++++++++--------
>  arch/mips/mm/fault.c                               |  6 ++--
>  .../ftrace/test.d/kprobe/multiple_kprobes.tc       |  2 ++
>  3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.1.0

seires applied to mips-next.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]