[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220512160909.GC14475@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2022 18:09:09 +0200
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
To: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS: tools: no need to initialise statics to 0
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:31:46AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> Static variables do not need to be initialised to 0, because compiler
> will initialise all uninitialised statics to 0. Thus, remove the
> unneeded initializations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <wangborong@...rlc.com>
> ---
> arch/mips/boot/tools/relocs.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/mips/boot/tools/relocs.c b/arch/mips/boot/tools/relocs.c
> index 1bf53f3524b3..02fc85f3e8ff 100644
> --- a/arch/mips/boot/tools/relocs.c
> +++ b/arch/mips/boot/tools/relocs.c
> @@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static void read_symtabs(FILE *fp)
>
> static void read_relocs(FILE *fp)
> {
> - static unsigned long base = 0;
> + static unsigned long base;
> int i, j;
>
> if (!base) {
> --
> 2.35.1
applied to mips-next.
Thomas.
--
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a
good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists