linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH net v5 3/3] ptp: clockmatrix: miscellaneous cosmetic change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <TYCPR01MB6608DC38FC74BB484E2B6079BACA9@TYCPR01MB6608.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Fri, 13 May 2022 19:57:26 +0000
From:   Min Li <min.li.xe@...esas.com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     "richardcochran@...il.com" <richardcochran@...il.com>,
        "lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net v5 3/3] ptp: clockmatrix: miscellaneous cosmetic
 change

> 
> First of all, I don't understand why you keep sending these patches for net.
> Please add more information about the changes to the commit messages.
> 
> For the formatting I was complaining about - you should fold updates to the
> code you're _already_modifying_ into the relevant patches.
> 
> You can clean up the rest of the code but definitely not in net. Code
> refactoring goes to net-next.
> 
> Perhaps a read of the netdev FAQ will elucidate what I'm on about:
> https://jpn01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.
> kernel.org%2Fdoc%2Fhtml%2Flatest%2Fprocess%2Fmaintainer-
> netdev.html&amp;data=05%7C01%7Cmin.li.xe%40renesas.com%7C3cbe9c7
> 3bb2e4e4765d608da3430e6c8%7C53d82571da1947e49cb4625a166a4a2
> a%7C0%7C0%7C637879681870307714%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8ey
> JWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
> %7C3000%7C%7C%7C&amp;sdata=cYeTkW596blMW6amKHFPk7cgv9G%2B
> R7%2B0zZP72DJebDA%3D&amp;reserved=0

Hi Jakub

There are multiple places where "no empty line between call and error check" and "return directly"
like you pointed out before. Some are related to this change and some are not. Do you prefer to fix only
the related ones in this patch or do them all in another patch to net-next

Min